What connections can you make between Taoism and the environmental or other social or political movements? Elaborate

Confucious and the golden rule, East meets west

Number 1—
Confucius was once asked if there was one rule that could serve as the guide to one’s whole life. He replied: “What you do not want done to yourself, do not do to others.” How does this rule compare with Jesus’ teaching on the Golden Rule, or other ethical or religious guidelines? Look at these Biblical verses to see if you can tell the difference: Matthew 7:12; Matthew 5:21-26, 43-48 (see the Webliography for an online Bible). Is there one rule that you live by?

Number2—-
The ideas of the Tao Te Ching (Daodejing—see a modern version I recommend: http://www.beatrice.com/TAO.pdf ; or sample still more versions here. ) have been widely translated into English. Consider this saying from the Tao #8: “The best man is like water. Water is good; it benefits all things and does not compete with them. It dwells in places that all disdain…The best man in his dwelling loves the earth…” What does this mean to you? Do you agree with this philosophy?

What connections can you make between Taoism and the environmental or other social or political movements? Elaborate.

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………

ORDER NOW

“Whom did we save?” You? Your friend? Or, did we create some new third person?

One day you and a good friend of yours are crossing Hooper Avenue. You are not looking where you are going, and you are run down by a cement truck. Your friend is so shocked that he or she drops dead from a massive stroke. But as luck has it, someone from the OCC psychology department rushes both bodies over to the nearby medical center for a dramatic emergency operation. It seems that although your body was destroyed in the accident, your head was not harmed at all. Since your friend has a perfectly healthy body, it seems that we might be able to save at least one of you, by putting your brain into your friend’s body. The doctor in charge said that we can do this by removing the upper 30% of your brain (the damaged part) and grafting on to the lower part of your friend’s brain. This way we do not have to attach the whole brain to the spine, and we do not have to worry about matching the hormones of the two people involved. You see, your friend is the opposite sex as you. So, if you are female, the top part of your brain is now attached to the bottom part of a man’s brain, which is sitting in a male body. If you are male, the situation is reversed. Thus, all portions of the brain responsible for producing hormones, (testosterone for the male body; estrogen for the female), have remained intact. The only part of the brain that was replaced was the portion responsible for consciousness, thought, memory, and, a sense of self. These are all the same that you possessed at the time of the accident. The philosophical question that we must now raise is, “Whom did we save?” You? Your friend? Or, did we create some new third person? For the time being, we will call this individual “Schwartz.” This name is not gender specific. And it does not bias our judgment, at the outset, in favor of any one conclusion in particular.

Two of your philosopher friends come into your room to visit you. Choose your two friends from any of the philosophers within Chapter 3. After a round of “Hellos” and “How are you feeling,” the three of you begin to discuss the following questions:

Who survived the operation?

Is “it” the “same” person who existed five minutes before the accident?

Is “it” the “same” person who will exist five years after the accident?

This situation is farfetched. But thinking about it forces us to ask questions about what the human “self” and a human “being” really are. Are we basically a mind, which is tied to such things as consciousness and memories? Are we a metaphysical soul, which exists separate from our body and our consciousness? Are we basically bodies, connected to instinct, hormones, and to all the various physical and material body processes? Are we products of culture, and thus tied to the way others see and judge us? Or, are we some sort of mixture of two or more of these things?

Your assignment is to write a two to three page paper (from 700 to 1000 words), which tells what happened in the conversation that you had with the two philosophers. Where did you agree; and where did you disagree?

Your paper should be organized into the four sections described below. Please use the section headings, Part One, Part Two, Part Three and Part Four, within your paper.

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………

Part One: Area of . Write an introduction to your paper, which clearly identifies a general area of philosophy, within which the philosophical problem that you will be exploring can be found. Refer to Chapter One if you need to review these areas. Do you think that the question posed above place your discussion within Metaphysics, Theory of Knowledge, Ethics, Political Philosophy, and/or Philosophy of Religion? Part one of your paper should be brief and concise. No more than 50 to 100 words maximum.

 

Part Two: Argument Analysis. Present the points of view, and the arguments supporting those views, from the two philosophers you have chosen to discuss these philosophical questions with you. Summarize and pick these arguments apart a little. What are the main premises of their arguments? Does they make any important assumptions? What evidence do they present that is factual and verifiable? And what evidence do they present that is more a matter of speculation and/or interpretation? In this section of your paper you are merely analyzing, or, picking apart the arguments. Do not draw any conclusions as to whether or not these arguments are valid and/or sound. This section of your paper should be at least 250 words.

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………

Part Three: Argument Evaluation. In this section present and defend some judgments about these arguments. Are these premises safe to accept? Are there any questionable assumptions made? If we do accept them do they take us logically to their conclusions? Your evaluation should make explicit use of concepts such as “assumption,” “soundness” and “validity,” as these are presented within Chapter One of the text. This section of your paper should be at least 250 words.

 

Part Four: Conclusion. Draw your own interesting and relevant conclusions about the philosophical problem you are exploring. Do not merely offer a set of “feelings” or an “opinion.” Instead, build your own argument, regarding the questions above. If you find that you are in agreement with some of the philosopher’s ideas, then you can use these as part of your own argument, so long as you do not merely reiterate what they are saying. This part of your paper should be 300 words minimum.

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………

Gender Psychology: Gender Differences in Suicide Toughts, Plans, and Executions

Gender Psychology: Gender Differences in Suicide Toughts, Plans, and Executions
The goal of this paper is to examine the gender differences in rates of suicide within the field of gender psychology and to investigate the cause of the gender differences within the specific behavior.
Incorporate Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory as the theoretical approach of gender differences between females’ and males’ suicide thoughts, plans, and executions.
You will be expected to summarize Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory AND also include research on the Social Learning Theory’s perspective.
Lastly, you will conclude your paper with a summary of the main points and a discussion of future research in the subject area you selected based on your research. This paper will require a minimum of 8 references and the references cannot be older than ten years.

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………

What is Marxism? How is it similar as well as different from Socialism? Illustrate and explain the effects of Marxism worldwide in both the past and present.

What is Marxism? How is it similar as well as different from Socialism? Illustrate and explain the effects of Marxism worldwide in both the past and present.

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………

Personality Theories

Personality Theories
create a chart comparing the theories of the following psychoanalytic psychologists:
Sigmund Freud
Carl Gustav Jung
Alfred Adler
Karen Horney
Erik Erikson
Your chart should include the following areas: Theorist, orientation, key motivational forces, model of personality structure, and view of personality development.
Example:
Theorist
Orientation
Motivational forces
Model of personality structure
Personality development
Sigmund Freud
Psychodynamic
Sex and …
Id …
Emphasis on …
Select one psychologist from your chart and use the Internet as a research tool to explore the personality theory of this psychologist.
Write a 1-page summary of your chosen theorist and his/her view of personality development.
Using a word processing program (such as MS Word), write a summary of your findings on the theorist you selected.
Be sure to describe clearly and briefly how personality development occurs according to your chosen theorist.

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………

Technology alone is not enough—it’s technology married with the liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the results that make our heart sing

“Technology alone is not enough—it’s technology married with the liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the results that make our heart sing.” – Steve Jobs, introducing the iPad 2 in 2011 (MindEdge, Inc., 2014)
From your studies, you have seen how culture, belief systems, and exposure to the arts affect the way people view the world. Learning about these differences in perspective helps us to have a better understanding of what it means to be human. When we understand and value the humanistic point of view, we bring creative solutions and fresh new ideas to the challenges we face in our personal and professional lives. We are schooled in the fundamentals of close analysis, critical thinking, and teasing out the complexities of issues which have no simple right or wrong answer.
In task 1, you wrote an analysis on a piece of literature. In this task, you will write an analysis (suggested length of 3–5 pages) of one work from the disciplines of visual art or music. Choose one work from the list below:
Classical Period
• Art: Agesander, Athenodorus, and Polydorus of Rhodes, The Laocoön Group, Late 2nd Century
Middle Ages
• Art: Andrei Rublyev, Three Angels (The Holy Trinity), ca. 1410
• Music: Guillaume de Machaut, “Messe de Nostre Dame”, ca. 1325
Renaissance
• Art: Hans Holbein the Younger, The Ambassadors, 1533
• Music: Thomas Morley, “Now is the Month of Maying,” 1595
Baroque
• Art: Johannes Vermeer, The Art of Painting, c. 1666
• Music: J.S. Bach, Cello Suite #1, c. 1717-1723
NeoClassical / Classical (Music)
• Art: Angelica Kauffmann, Cornelia Presenting Her Children as Her Treasures or Mother of the Gracchi, 1785
• Music: Ludwig van Beethoven, Symphony #5 Mvmt I, 1804–1808
Romanticism
• Art: J.M.W. Turner, Slave Ship, 1840
• Music: Hector Berlioz, Symphonie Fantastique, 1830
Realism
• Art: Édouard Manet, A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, 1882
• Music: Julia Ward Howe, “The Battle Hymn of the Republic,” 1862
Modernism
• Art: Aaron Douglas, Aspects of Negro Life, 1934
• Music: Billie Holiday, “Strange Fruit,” 1939
Postmodernism
• Art: Maya Lin, Vietnam Veterans Memorial, 1982
• Music: Queen, “Bohemian Rhapsody,” 1975 or Michael Jackson, “Man in the Mirror,” 1988
Once you have selected and viewed the work, you will create a paragraph of descriptive writing with your personal observations about the work. This paragraph must be written before you do research on the work, the artist or composer, and the period it comes from. You will need to be detailed in your description of the work.
The next step will be to research the work, the life of the artist, and the period. You will then be ready to create your analysis. This process of analysis will require you to discuss the historical context of the work, pertinent aspects of the artist’s or composer’s biography, themes and/or stylistic characteristics of its historical period and finally, the relevance of this work for audiences today.
The final requirement of the task will be to reflect on this process and describe how the analysis informed or altered your perception of the work.
Requirements:
A. Record your initial reaction to the work (suggested length of 1 paragraph or half a page) by doing the following:
1. Describe your initial thoughts and/or feelings about the work.
2. Describe in detail at least one aspect of the work that most interests you.
B. Analyze the work (suggested length of 2–4 pages) by doing the following:
1. Describe the historical context of the period in which the work was written.
2. Discuss insights into the work that can be gained from the author’s biography.
3. Analyze how this work explores a particular theme and/or stylistic characteristic from its period.
4. Explain the relevance of this work for today’s audiences.
C. Reflect on how the analysis affected your perception of the work (suggested length of 1 paragraph or half a page).
1. Discuss how the deeper knowledge you gained through your analysis has informed or altered your thoughts and/or feelings about the work.
D. When you use sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, provide acknowledgement of source information for any content that is quoted, paraphrased or summarized. Acknowledgement of source information includes in-text citation noting specifically where in the submission the source is used and a corresponding reference, which includes:
• Author
• Date
• Title
• Location of information (e.g., publisher, journal, or website URL)
Note: The use of APA citation style is encouraged but is not required for this task. Evaluators will offer feedback on the acknowledgement of source information but not with regard to conformity with APA or other citation style. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Resources web link found under General Information/APA Guidelines in the left-hand panel in Taskstream.
Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly.
Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.
Reference List:
Note: This reference list refers only to direct citations in the assessment above and may be different from those you need to complete the assessment. Consult your Course of Study for a list of suggested learning resources.
MindEdge, Inc. (2014). Introduction to the humanities. Waltham, MA: MindEdge, Inc.

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………

Ancient Philosophy

Choose one of the following three Ancient Philosophy Topics
1) (From the Republic Book VII) WHY SHOULD THE PHILOSOPHER RULE? EXPLAIN WHY SHE IS BEST SUITED TO RULE AND EXPLAIN WHY IT IS A DILEMMA FOR HER TO CHOOSE TO RULE. WHY DOES SHE HAVE TO BE COMPELLED AND WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE COMPULSION? BE SURE TO COMMENT ON HOW THIS QUESTION IS RELATED TO THE ANSWER PLATO ATTEMPTS TO CONSTRUCT TO GLAUCON’S CHALLENGE?
2) From Book II of N.E. 1107a
?Excellence (Moral Virtue), then, is a state concerned with choice, lying in a mean relative to us, this being determined by reason and in the way in which the man of practical wisdom would determine it.? Explain each clause of Aristotle?s definition of a moral virtue: why is it a state (a disposition) and not an action; what is a mean relative to us; what is a man of practical wisdom, i.e, a role model?
3) (From the Nicomachean Ethics, Book 3, though Book 2 has to be read and understood) WHAT IS ARISTOTLE?S ACCOUNT OF VOLUNTARY ACTION? HOW DOES VOLUNTARY ACTION DIFFER FROM FORCED ACTION, INVOLUNTARY ACTION AND NON-VOLUNTARY ACTION? WHY IS THE DISCUSSION RELEVANT TO WHAT PRECEDES AND WHAT FOLLOWS, I.E., THE ACCOUNT OF VIRTUE AND THE ACCOUNT OF DELIBERATION?

Click Here For More Details on How to Work on this Paper……

Need a Professional Writer to Work on this Paper and Give you a 100 % Original Paper? Click Here and Get this Essay Done………………